[clowntable]

If A ranks voting for a politician P higher than any other activity at the given time, why shouldn't he/she?

I guess so called Anarchists could then stop calling A an Anarchist on the grounds of supporting "the machinery of evil" and if they do it on their private property or somewere where it is allowed by the owner of the property I see no problem with that.

Now what was the question again?
Ah yes labels suck let people decide for their own instead of forcing a pseudo collectivism on them by labeling them as X and threatening to remove that label.

I wonder who commits the worse crime. The person who calls himself/herself an Anarchist but then plays along in the government-regime by voting or the person who calls himself an Anarchist and then uses collectivist methods to discriminate.

Hint: neither is a crime.

Of course this is all very hypocratical since no so called Anarchist that I know of actively resists all unjust laws. They all swim along nicely and cherry pick the issues that interest them (i.e. voting).
So if ones position is that an anarchist should not vote, by what justification should an Anarchist follow unjust laws or participate in other non law breaking activities that violate anarchist ethics?