[Jeffmet3]

[ QUOTE ]
"How do you know the market doesn't rate the quarterback change as skillfully as you?"

I said that only I know.

As far as whether I am talking about inside information or not, what difference does it make? This debate is over my contention that you can have an edge because you have somehow evaluated one aspect of the stock better than others have, even if you know nothing else about the company. I still don't get why you can't see that as obvious.

[/ QUOTE ]

But how can you possibly know that you evaluated this aspect better than others?

TASR's price increase could've had absolutely nothing to do with what you saw as an inequality.

I think what he's trying to say, is that by showing 2 stocks that went up, you're using this information to justify your strategy which defies the accepted opinion and that's being results oriented.