[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Exactly.
Show me your fossilized skeletal remains of all the "birdtiles" over the last few billion years and I'll jump on your bandwagon.
What, you can't? Precisely.
So stop trying to pretend your version of history is scientific fact.
[/ QUOTE ]
Here is a good example of a "birdtile":
Archaeopteryx
[/ QUOTE ]
To that I say this:
[ QUOTE ]
Dr. Alan Feduccia, a world authority on birds at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an evolutionist himself, said: “Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earth-bound, feathered dinosaur. But it’s not. It is a bird, a perching bird. And no amount of 'paleobabble' is going to change that.”
[/ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ]
Of course its a bird. Remember the whole discussion we had about the meaninglessness of these distinctions? Its a bird, its a reptile, its a birdtile...just depends on what you want to call it. I'd LOVE to hear how he so cavalierly decided it was a bird. What characteristics did he use? What are the hallmarks of Birdhood?
[/ QUOTE ]
Dr. Feduccia (and he is one of the most noted experts on bird origins and evolution) uses the argument that archaeopteryx talons are more similar to tree-dwelling birds than land-based reptiles' claws to distinguish it as a bird. But just as important, he also concludes that birds evolved from reptile, in spite of his contention that archaeopteryx is a bird. So his opinion doesn't help the whole "macro evolution is a farce" stance.