[Inso0]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Is it safe to assume you are ok with 'microevolution' being taught in schools? Stuff like dog breeds, cauliflower, viruses? I want to get a feel for where we are at. Is that a type of evolution you are ok with? Its still a theory, just so you know. Do you contend that this evolution is untestable? That it isn't science?

[/ QUOTE ]


Only a fool would deny microevolution as reality.

It has been demonstrated and tested.

Macro has not, and cannot be tested or demonstrated.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are going to have to propose some mechanism that allows micro and forbids macro.

And then you are going to have to retract your previous statement about theories, because while you may think microevolution is a more ROBUST theory, it is still certainly a theory.

[/ QUOTE ]

Once again, micro evolution can be testable and demonstrable.

Macro is not.


Micro Evolution is demonstrated every single time someone creates a new breed of chicken, or new type of corn. Genetic engineering itself is forced micro evolution.

I'm going to stop posting in this thread now. My statements are becoming repetitive, as are your "rebuttals".