Re: DNA + Microevolution+ Bayes =Macroevolution
[ QUOTE ]
Are you going to tell me that .999999999 = 1 next?
There is always a "first" (insert whatever here)
There was a first cell.
There was a first amino acid.
There was a first sentient being.
There was a first primate.
There was a first reptile.
There was a first fish.
By you trying to explain this way by "change over time" brings everything full circle to where I ask you to point out hard proof of this supposed change over time that doesn't exist.
[/ QUOTE ]
Vhawk, here would be a good place for you to explain transitions, ring species, etc.
|