View Single Post
  #35  
Old 05-16-2007, 12:54 PM
Rduke55 Rduke55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,958
Default Re: DNA + Microevolution+ Bayes =Macroevolution

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But you need species - using Mayr's definition of reproductively isolated, etc. - to really get at evolution because once gene flow stops between populations then they each develop unique paths and evolutionary histories.

[/ QUOTE ]

Mayr's definitions are becoming increasingly dated, the inaccuracies are highlighted by interpecies sex. Which gene pools are allowed to mingle with others is a highly dynamic process.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you elaborate?

Also, I'm not saying that there aren't problems with defining "species" or that transitional organisms or exceptions can't be found - this is biology after all.
Reply With Quote