Re: OT: Do you guys think this is a good staking deal?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you can pwn the 100's on your own money, then being staked 50% to play the 200's makes no sense at all. You're just making money for someone else at the probable expense of a lower win rate at the 200's vs. 100's.
[/ QUOTE ]
But I'm not sure if I can beat the 200s and I dont want to risk my own money trying to find out.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well, now it makes even less sense. Why is your investor staking you to donk around with his money? You're not sure you can beat the 200's and he's staking you? Can I talk to this guy? I've got a bridge to sell him. To cap it all off, as amazingly bad as this deal is for your investor, you get nothing out of it either other than the warm, fuzzy feeling of your giant $200-HU-playing ecock scraping on the ground as you walk.
[/ QUOTE ]
Slim I have shown that I can crush the 50s and 100s. He believes that this should carry over the the 200s. Is that so unreasonable? He also has met me here in california and thinks my credentials as a human being make it very likely that I will succeed.
[/ QUOTE ]
Did you share with Him that you have been banned from 2+2 for like 98,495,867,330 times [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]All of which had nothing to do with your human credentials [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|