[Our House]

[ QUOTE ]
There needs to be some sort of middle ground.

[/ QUOTE ]
There already is. We're just too involved in the 2+2 lifestyle to realize it.

[ QUOTE ]
Obviously I don't want poker sites confiscating funds right and left over any little matter, as that would lead to horrible problems.

[/ QUOTE ]
No reputable poker sites have done this yet. When we read about it happening, it's usually the most extreme examples.

[ QUOTE ]
And obviously I don't want botters/scammers/cheaters running amok either.

[/ QUOTE ]
No reputable poker sites have allowed this yet. When we read about it happening, it's usually the most extreme examples.

I guess you can see my point. Middle ground situations DO occur. They just aren't enough of a publicity attraction to be made public. It's been like that for a long time. I remember several instances where Party conducted investigations and closed accounts of cheaters that were local to my area (New York/New Jersey). The only reason I know about them is because of the live game circle I was in. One of my casual player friends even had his account temporarily closed because he happened to be at the wrong tables at the wrong times; and he played so badly that Party thought he had to be part of this cheating ring. His account was reopened, but the other actual colluders never saw their accounts or their money again.

There is no 2+2 assistance in many of these "quiet" cases and they're NOT generally made public. I'm sure there are lots of situations that are handled solely by poker sites.

Probably 90+% of the world of poker occurs outside of 2+2. Yet, for some reason, most of our poker experience is based upon events from inside. It's an unfair bias.