[_dave_]

[ QUOTE ]
If not bots, then it cannot be anything other then multi-accounting. One player gives the shots, the others just push the buttons.
Just another ZeeJustin variant.


[/ QUOTE ]

<font color="red">NO NO NO NO NO!</font>

The outrage with ZeeJustin was that he as times was sat at the same tables as himself, unavoidably sharing hole card information therefore colluding with himself (despite opening extra SNGs to "depreciate the advantage")

There is no issue with people playing a set strategy if they are not colluding!

The only advantage these swetshop players have is reduced tilt / increased reads via volume of others in addition to ther own play - similar to that gained from coaching / sweating / reading "official regulars" threads.


The danger of botting is that a bot can play unattended / multiply limited only by CPU power- if there is a real human carrying out a predefined strategy flawlessly, THIS IS NOT A BOT - THIS IS NOT A PROBLEM - THIS IS NOT UNETHICAL!

That is, if there is a human actually confirming each and every action. FTP concludes this is the case... do we have ANY conclusive evidence to the contrary?