[DWarrior]

[ QUOTE ]
1. Assuming his story is 100% true, isn't this repeated and flagrant violation of the unofficial "1 player to a hand" rule?

Obviously online such a rule is informal and having a friend at your PC for a hand or two every now and then is standard, but this is willful and repeated violation of it? Uh?

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this actually against the T&C to begin with? I hear people throw the "ought to be", and now "only if it occurs constantly"

[ QUOTE ]
2. No NL system can be so precise to account for all scenarios, to the point where 35 people can all memorize and utilize it. NL is way too dynamic.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not 35 players. The number 35 is just the accounts that got frozen due to having transfers. As others have said, this is very possible (trading, rb, sidebets, etc)

[ QUOTE ]
3. The whole story just stinks to high heaven.

We're supposed to believe that a player will sit down and memorize a system to make X amount per hour, but then only take a cut of that himself? After you memorize the "system" why not just leave and go make the full amount, without giving the house it's cut?

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this actually happening? As I understand it it's X guys just sharing their wins/losses to even out variance.