[DVaut1]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is it fair to ask curtains (and others) how long/how much they knew about Zee and others multi-accounting?

[/ QUOTE ]

No.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why not?

You've got two buddies. Buddy A has been taking a few bucks out of your pocket every now and then without you knowing. Buddy B knows, however -- but doesn't tell you about it.

You catch Buddy A with his hand in your pocket -- and you feel (justifiably) wronged. Buddy B admits he knew what Buddy A was doing, and admits what Buddy A was doing was wrong -- shouldn't he have to explain why he didn't tell you?

[/ QUOTE ]

Next, let's dig up McCarthy and round up all them commies!

You're not a pinko, are you? Hmmmmmm

[/ QUOTE ]

I think my example was appropriate.

I don't want a witch-hunt -- but I think it's unethical to remain silent if you know cheating is occuring. It most certainly cost some people money who would have liked to have known that the best players were utilizing this strategy.

I'm sure anyone who knew (IF anyone knew) what ZJ was doing felt they were in a complicated situation. Merely because it was complicated doesn't mean we can't flesh out right from wrong, and learn from our mistakes.