[gurgeh]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
And you are abusing your power by doing what you did.

[/ QUOTE ]
So labeling a cheater as a cheater is somehow an abuse of power? Yeah OK....

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok and how about next he starts labeling bad players as "donkeys". Is that okay too?

[/ QUOTE ]

He can start by relabeling two of the biggest supporters of this action. Ron Burgundy gets the title "hypocrite." I don't mind so much the taking money from Party during the cruise fiasco, but the BS you posted was certifiable. You're not desperate to keep it if Party were to take it back and then you cashed out as soon as there was any word at all they might correct the error. Come on man, if you don't think that gets you a new title, you need to read the section of Poker, Gaming, and Life dealing with "How People Lie to Themselves."

Also add illegit as "village idiot" for writing two incredibly stupid, irrelevant, and inflamatory things in a single sentence. It's okay, he won't find this fact objectionable.

Still want moderators changing titles?

Seriously, there is little humor in the situation, and there is no utility in "labeling the cheater." We all know what he did. In case you didn't notice, there's a thread with 30498 views and 686 replies about it. The only thing this accomplished was to rub salt into the wound. If you believe that is the function of a moderator, you are entitled to that opinion, but don't tell us it's for the sake of keeping the rest of us safe. I don't need Penn and Teller to know that's a bunch of bull [censored].