[pirateboy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
shes a solid 4 IMO. If she lost some weight she could easily be a 5

The more interesting question is, is this OPs GF, or is OP the girl?

[/ QUOTE ]

Outline what aspects make her a 4. She's butt [censored] ugly

[/ QUOTE ]

Shes not butt ugly. I can find a TON of uglier chicks than this girl in 30 seconds, hell just look at the other girls in those pics. If this girl is a 2 or 1 (as you are implying), wtf are all the super fat nasty girls then?

This girl is a 4 because her titties aint bad. She isnt incredibly fat, just the typical overweight college chick who could stand to lose 20 pounds. Her face isnt hideously deformed, she doesnt have any striking giant physical flaw, its just her arrangement of features isnt very attractive. So in short, shes basically your average looking girl just chubby. So a 4.

Really if you make 5 exactly average as how peole in america actually look (as opposed to how we should look), then shes a 5 because shes pretty much your average chubby bland girl. God bless fast food.

[/ QUOTE ]

Good post. She's a 3 or 2 in my mind, with a lot of movement in that range. She has the nasty sideburns that most chubby girls have. Yuck.