Re: Bodog ROFL_copter
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't even know horse racing at all and this sounds totally ignorant to me.
[/ QUOTE ]
What about it is ignorant? I dont know horseracing either and have never have claimed so. I was stating (using numbers) that the horse has history against him. +250 equates to the horse winning the triple crown 28% of the time which has not been the case throughout history. The history of the triple crown is what makes winning it so sacred.
Clark, you said yourself the horse must win both. Races, none of those 6 horses that won the preakness won both races. My point is that the triple crown has been won so few times (which I tried showing with statistics) that this horse would have had to show me something extremely imrpessive in order for the yes to have value.
[/ QUOTE ]
The Kansas City Royals won on May 8th and 9th last year. Does that make it more or less likely that they will win this year on May 8th and 9th?
|