[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The people who are arguing that entering twice is by itself unethical are distracting from the issue. The ethics part of this debate is that one person can not fairly have two seats at one table. The result of this possibility is that Party has to make a rule banning multiaccounting. The debate shouldn't be about EV, adding money to the prize pool, or the fact that *most* of the time, multiaccounting is the equivalent is adding another independent player. If a multiaccounter never was at the same table with himself, there would not be a fundamentally unfair situation. Arguing that there is or focusing on this point at all allows the people defending the practice in general to focus their argument away from the real issue.
[/ QUOTE ]
you are incorrect sir!
[/ QUOTE ]
Did you read the rest of the post? It is against the rules and has to be because of the potential collusion issue. When you sign up you have to agree to the rules. Everything else is smoke screen.
Great photo.