Re: I spew
[ QUOTE ]
hand 1:
By weak tight I wanted to point out he was tight both pre and postflop. Only two hands went to showdown with heavy action: a set and a straight.
Given his tendencies it seemed A high call-downs were not in his repertoire.
After the call on the turn I thought he was trying to spike a pair, on a bigger draw (+ flush or gutshot) or an overpair which the paired turn freezed up.
I bet the river as I usually do against typical villains. Against this one I couldnīt see my hand having +50% equity IF called.
Hand 2:
Against these particular opponent (aggressive and showdown bound) probably would have been best not to charge myself and cut my implied odds specially Oop with 6 high.
This is a non-threatening board for whatever hand he happens to hold. Plus Iīm setting myself up to fire the turn and probably the river if I donīt improve.
Hand 3:
Ace high,big pot, many contestants, oop.
q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
Those might have been better candidates for a bet.
thoughts?
[/ QUOTE ]
hmmm ... hand one: this guy did raise UTG - so we can say the only hand that will call you most likely has you beat TT (would he play JJ so weak too?) ... other than those hands he has a bunch of big cards that he'll fold
hand 2
these over aggro guys pay-off so well when you hit that pushing your hand probably isn't necessary (and you pair outs are good a lot too)
hand 3
I thought the club was a spade ... I like a bet less now
|