[mosdef]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There's been no interaction until a bullet actually does travel from his property to yours.

[/ QUOTE ]

"The state is not actually using force to coerce behaviour from you until you break the law and the put you in jail."

True or not true?

[/ QUOTE ]

Non sequitur.

[/ QUOTE ]

I suppose you could make that case. It still seems to me that you're saying:

The threat that the state will harm me if I violate their rules is a violation of individual rights.

The threat that pvn will accidentally shoot mosdef regardless of what mosdef does is not a violation of his rights because it's just a threat and that doesn't count.

I don't find that set of arguments compelling.