[mosdef]

[ QUOTE ]
I've already pointed out several times that I did not claim this. Are you going to persist?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well this is the problem. On the one hand, you insist that you are not saying that individual rights are disputable (because they have to be objectively evident to be rights), but on the other hand your whole argument is based on the fact that if I disagree with your definition of rights then I'm just "wrong".

I will try one more time. If I say something is my right (for example, the right to not be endangered by your gun), and you say it not my right, what does that mean? Is it not my right because disagreement means that it is not objectively definable as a right? Does the disagreement automatically disqualify it as a right? Yes or no, please.