Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I gave you an example of their constructive use. I disproved the argument that they have no legitmate use. The riot example is not the best example or the best argument, but it is enough to disprove your argument that these "types" of guns are totally unnecessary.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well, without answering my second question in my previous post you're not disproving anything. For assault weapons (not fully-automatic assault rifles) to be necessary, I argue that they must have some positive ability that other weapons don't. So, again, couldn't the shop owners have defended themselves with something like a glock?
[/ QUOTE ]
Maybe, but probably not as effectively. Please define what differentiates an "assult" weapon from a "happy-peaceful fun" weapon too.
|