[MTBlue]

[ QUOTE ]
Assume you have a choice of two tables to play at. One is a full 6max table, with yourself, another good 2p2er, a 40bb shortstack, and two fishy looking 40/10/2 randoms who open limp. The other is three handed with a fairly good but too tight 18/14/3 regular and a fullstacked 30/10.

Which do you pla

y assuming you are already 7 tabling and want to play one more. (basically my example is based on you 8 tabling 6max, and one table breaking down to 3 handed - is it more profitable to find a new full table, or do you play 3 handed).

If you feel one is significantly more profitable than the other, by how much would you guess and why?

Oh and another similar question - you are 8 tabling 6max and one breaks to HU and the opponent is pretty bad. Keep playing him HU or leave and find a new 6max table with more fish?

[/ QUOTE ]

Either table is a dream table past 5/10NL. The first table I would take over the second. The 30/10 strategy is going to be more closer to optimal 3 handed and the 18/14 is going to be +EV to play against but not as much 2 40/12.

On the HU's question (assuming the stake is large enough that the rake is negligible), I will play somebody I feel like I'm significantly better than HU even if it means I have to shut down another table.