View Single Post
  #7  
Old 02-22-2006, 03:52 AM
Pokeraddict Pokeraddict is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not Absolute
Posts: 4,535
Default Re: Question for Olback/Poker Incentives Review

In other words you are busted. If your traffic figures were legit you wouldnt side step some 30 questions that have been brought to your attention that are very legit questions. I'm glad you posted January 1 stats that show 1000 page views. I think that proves my point that something is fishy. You needed one day at 12,000 just to offset that one. No way one day, even a holiday, could be 15% of your average traffic with such huge numbers.

I dont know about me being obsessed with your site. I have made it obvious your posing as an affiliate to try and pry info from me in April was sleazy just as when I caught you trying to hire a site scraper at Rentacoder to steal my site's content. I notice you have not even tried to deny either, not ever. Dont worry, I can prove they happened in case you decide to deny them.

As for questioning affiliates on your site. You list whoever you want, when I felt we were at peace I let you know of Rakeprovider.com before they were even listed on your site. They had copied a large affiliates site word for word on multiple pages. If someone is going to steal content then they are an thief in my mind. Any webmaster that creates their own content will agree. No one ever caught site scraping will ever be on RRR and I figured you would think same way, instead you listed them at the top the following month. Your current #1, well, I'm not even going to go there.

You have not built a site that can produce similiar traffic, dont insult me or the rest of the forum. You are nowhere to be found on virtually every Google rakeback/poker related search, you dont even have any backlinks in Google and they just updated them this weekend, you dont advertise anywhere but here and a spam post in a another forum here and there.

PIR's ZERO backlinks on Google

I have proven 100 times over your figures are flawed in some way. I cant imagine there is even a shadow of a doubt to anyone involved in the rakeback affiliate business that your numbers are grossly inflated. Your refers to your advertisers are very low, your forum has 5 posts that arent yours, your traffic on your site drops when you arent around to hit reload, according to Alexa I have at least 30 times your traffic (RRR has over 200,000 page views a day? I wish), your visitors on average view nearly every page on your site which is obviously ridiculous and all you want to do is make this about me.

I would have let you be but when I saw that ridiculous claim last night it was time to bring it out. I am not going to sit and watch people who are in this industry be blatantly lied to and spammed by someone claiming to be a watchdog in their industry, you dont even delist people that have obviously stolen their entire site's content when it is proven to you.

I have received messages from 25-30 applauding me for letting all of this out. You are not fooling anyone, I was at least expecting you to say you bought the traffic or they were bots by now. Trying to claim these are 6500 page views a day clicked through from this forum, your blog or your Pokerforums.org spam is crazy and these are the only three places they could have really come from as link finders only come up with links from those sites that are poker related and not spidered with PIR.

Feel free to ignore this thread, it will die on its own but no one will forget you getting caught making these claims and getting caught up so bad you will not even answer the questions.

Around half of the advertisers on my site have come to me in one way or another supporting me and applauding me for coming out with this thread, I wonder why........

You are right, your stats are your business even though you had no problem misrepresenting yourself to try and get mine last year, at least I am openly stating who I am and why they need to come out.

By side stepping all of this overwhelming proof your silence makes the answers obvious to me and others.

Maybe I did not have the right to publicly debate this but there is overwhelming support among those involved in the business that I bring all of this dishonesty out, and I am glad I did.
Reply With Quote