View Single Post
  #2  
Old 04-12-2007, 06:31 AM
NT! NT! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 17,165
Default Re: Two points against Intellectual property laws

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The federal government subsidized research behind 45 of the 50 top-selling drugs in the US in 2005. This is common in other industries as well; taxpayers are the ones who foot a large portion of the bill for research, yet drug companies still attain record profit margins selling the drugs back to us.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, even accepting this, would drug companies bother with the research if there were no profit motive at the end of the development cycle? From a buisness standpoint, I don't see how they could and until there was some other system in place to foster the development, I'd be very wary of eliminating/loosening IP.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well if we're already paying someone to do it, we could easily hire the scientists who had been working for the drug companies once they all close up shop.
Reply With Quote