[danzasmack]

meh while losing at a small rate over a large sample could be variance i think it's imporant to consider the fact that you are making small mistakes that have added up over a long sample.

TBH I've found these threads shocking. Not that I crush or anything like that but it was like one day EVERYBODY just decided to post that they weren't winning. I thought everybody was like 1bb winners trying to get to 2/2.5.

For a 4 week stretch through january and some of february i was a big winner at HU and a marginal loser (like -.8bb/100) at 6max. Not everything is variance. I sucked at 6max, plain and simple. Not that I still don't suck but I got a lot better when I decided I did suck. I think I'm playing really well now but we'll see what I have to say about that in another 3 months.

Sometimes stuff that seems OK, like 3-betting light on the button because you do that sometimes, or c/c'ing down A hi, is sometimes just totally wrong. Now I get in pots with players who make like standard/good plays but I know that the play in particular vs. me is like REALLY good or REALLY bad. From his end, he just got unlucky or the hand was w/e but if you think about it, it wasn't and is just like spewage.

I'm not trying to come off as like arrogant here I'm not a big winner in the stars 5/10 game or anything like that just sharing some stuff that I've been working on lately that has really helped my game.