[thepizzlefosho]

[ QUOTE ]
ur not checking to induce a river bet, ur checking bc u dont have enough equity vs his range to bet

[/ QUOTE ]

gehrig - good point and its makes sense. Don't you think that inducing a bluff is kind of icing on the cake though? i.e....you don't want to be c/r'ed, but a check behind on the turn and a call on the river only loses 1 bet when villain has a K, and gains a bet when villain bluffs after missing a flush. is this line of thinking correct or am fundamentally thinking about these situations the wrong way?

thanks for any insight.