Re: Grammar vs. Grammer
[ QUOTE ]
Hyachachachach we know exactly what you're saying, Daryn. "Irregardless" is a word, but it has the same meaning as - yet is strictly worse than - "regardless." Therefore, there is never a reason to use it, and therefore, when someone does, he defines himself as a moran. Can we agree on that?
I use "gonna" all the time. It's shorter, has a different feel, etc., than "going to." There are many examples of things like this, and I am perfectly fine with them. "Irregardless" has zero advantages to compensate for that extra syllable. In fact it has disadvantages. It are dumb, QED.
And yeah, I know you know.
[/ QUOTE ]
ok cool
is gonna a word? no
is irregardless a word? yes
i was just correcting an obvious error by fluff. when you come into this word and say [censored] like irregardless isn't a word you are gonna hear [censored] from me that's all baby.
|