Re: when giving free cards is better than betting vulnerable hands
[ QUOTE ]
OK, I'll say it directly. I believe: This hand did not happen, you do not play high stakes poker, and the subject you bring up has been discussed at length on this board before. The guy with 4 posts who says he was the villain is most likely you, as well, and I think you probably also were behind the "Huckster" account that most here believed was Huck Seed, and then claimed to have known all along when I busted you (this means you, FSU, and you, KKF). I don't know why I care about busting trolls, but I'm just so sick of what this board is becoming that I think I'm twoplustilting. I think I'd better step away for a while. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
[/ QUOTE ]
cero, you are entitled to your opinion even though it's incorrect. i consider myself a person of high integrity, and never appreciate when someone insinuates that i am not. of course, these are internet forums, so such skepticisms are par for the course.
i value my time and have no reason to post nonsense here. i was not aware of any discussion of this concept on these boards. there are a fair number of posts every day and i do not read them all. however, it seems that at least a few have gained some additional big-bet poker insight from this discussion, so the effort was not fruitless.
to be honest, i think these boards have become cluttered with many garbage posts. and i resent those who intentionally add to that garbage and make it harder to separate the wheat from the chaff. imho, there has been a recent lack of good strategy posts, so i thought i would take the time to contribute one. it's unfortunate that you did not benefit, but at least others did.
|