View Single Post
  #40  
Old 03-14-2007, 10:47 PM
slickpoppa slickpoppa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,588
Default Re: Public Health Care - Why not at state level first?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Who said anything about "great" care? Begging the question 101.

[/ QUOTE ]

Relax man, I'm not some socialist who thinks government health care is automatically awesome. I probably should have said "better" if that would make you happy.

[/ QUOTE ]

NT RLY. That's still begging the same question.


[/ QUOTE ]

I meant one state's hypothetical free health care being better than another state's free health care, not necessarily better than private health care. Jeez, it's like your just looking for any statist bias to bash when it's not even there.

[ QUOTE ]
I bet if you could just rent an apartment in Canada and get free health care, a lot of poorer Americans would go to Canada for free health care.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]

And I'm still wondering why people come from places with "free" and "better" health care come to the US every day for medical treatment.

And why people from the US travel to other countries with *even less* medical regulation.


[/ QUOTE ]

Again, I never said free medical care was better than private medical. You're reading something that was not there. But someone who does not have any money at all would obviously prefer to be somewhere where they could get free health care.
Reply With Quote