Re: Public Health Care - Why not at state level first?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So big government zealots- where am I wrong? Why is a state-by-state basis for this a poor idea?
[/ QUOTE ]
State by state is fine. I support socializing health care at either the federal or state level, just so long as it gets done.
[/ QUOTE ]
Do you agree that the state by state method is easier? Although it may never get implemented in a place like Montana where very few people would want it. I look at it two ways:
1) National first- slower to get support, but gets everyone under the program
2) State first- faster at first, and means many people will never get on board.
Doesn't having a decentralized system make more sense? If someone screws up, it won't take down the whole thing (just the one state that theres a problem). It allows more choices for people (although they do have to move, but its easier to move states than countries).
Where am I wrong in thinking this is the better way to do things.
|