[Dennisa]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If a fish did not find value in subscribing to a No rake poker site 2 years ago for 10 bucks a month, why would they want to load $100 bucks to play on pokerstars with $94.00.

[/ QUOTE ]

The logic is before they would load $100.00 and receive $100.00. If today they load $100.00 and only receive $94.00 they will never play again. The cost of rake is hidden, the cost of loading an account now is $6.00 on the first $100.00 which is not hidden.


I don't see the logic.
If a fish doesn't see the value in a no-rake site then they are MORE likely to not see any problem with depositing $100 and only getting $94 to play with.

People who are MORE AWARE are the ones who will have problems with the fees.
Those who are LESS AWARE are less likely to be bothered by it.

[/ QUOTE ]