[J_V]

Whether he won or lost is inconsequential, calling off 1/4 of your stack against a reraise from a guy that played one hand all show hoping you flop a set is poker 101 donking, or playing 2s5s against expert players out of position over and over again.

And one last rant, his idea of trying to put someone on a hand and then calling off all your chips when you can't figure it out, is so logically flawed it's laughable especially when he is so quick to discount hands with logic like "wouldn't have slowplayed xx, or would play xx preflop, or wouldn't call xx on the flop etc."

I'm not sure where that came into vogue, but it's such a wrong idea that he would be better off just asking "is this player bluffing here or not," and acting on that without any hand reading at all. How many times does he have to be shown some oddly played nut hand before he stops his poker 101 hand reading ritual?