View Single Post
  #43  
Old 02-16-2007, 04:08 PM
DrewDevil DrewDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,715
Default Re: A guys v. girls sports debate

[ QUOTE ]
the women would be better pure shooters, but they wouldn't be able to create too many open shots

[/ QUOTE ]

No, they aren't better pure shooters.

This is part of the myth that women have "skills" that are better than the men, and they are just hindered by inferior strength, height and speed. Nothing could be further from the truth.

There is NOTHING in sports that women do better than men. Take any skill or athletic competition you can name and open it up to every one. The men will dominate the competition, always, period, completely.

Men are better shooters, better passers, better defenders than women. Better free throw shooters. Whatever.

In golf, there's this myth that sure, the men can bomb it off the tee, but the women's short games are just as good. That's a lie. They suck. Their short games SUCK compared to the men. They can't putt nearly as well as the men.
Reply With Quote