View Single Post
  #115  
Old 02-16-2007, 02:05 PM
dirtysanchez dirtysanchez is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 980
Default Re: re:question

[ QUOTE ]
So the fact ive won a a lot of sit n gos both live and online shows that I clearly dont know what im doing?? That's what i find so funny about this. It's like primary school, people are presuming that the people who have made the most posts are the better players, they arent! There may be very good players who post a lot but posting is not a pre requisite of a good player. Like the title states, it's a "tricky sng question" meaning people are allowed to have an opinion. It totally depends on the way you've been playing as well as how your opponents have been playing. Generally the small blind could well fold here no matter what anyone says, he really could. Personally after playing for a few hours im not really interested in less than doubling my stake and going for 3rd. I would push here. The fact people are telling me im wrong for doing this proves that you don't have the capacity to acknowledge other people's views or to accept that you're not always right. I suppose my main point in this post is that just because you've made 1 million posts, it doesnt mean you're a better player than anyone else. Next you'll be arguing that players like Gus Hansen and Phil Ivey are wrong in raising or re raising with 56 off. If you're a good player theres not only 1 way to win.

[/ QUOTE ]

paddy, there are at least 3 or 4 better and more experienced sng players than me that have responded in this thread. Ive played about 8500 sngs, you? also, your point about raising and reraising 56o is silly, because this is a sng. there is 1 single solitary correct way to play in bubble situations. this isnt deepstacked cash, stacks here are less than 5 bbs deep. any error here costs you a lot of money. You offer nothing but the fact that you won a couple sngs as proof that you are even qualified to argue this w/ people like citanul, flourescent hippo, chrisV, etc. This is ludicrous, you cannot possibly be this dense. please reread the thread and present a coherent, rational argument if you want us to do anything but laugh.
Reply With Quote