View Single Post
  #87  
Old 02-15-2007, 07:33 PM
E.Z. E.Z. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 391
Default Re: No, I am saying the argument fails because it confuses people

i agree skallagrim..

any aggressive Pro could sit down at a full ring NL game (small stakes $50) and simply play position and make reads without looking at his cards.

just bluffing and betting the pot on the flop and firing through when scared cards hit. he would win money more than half the these short sessions all the while seldom (if ever) going to a showdown.

last year a guy wrote how he played in a WSOP event at the same table as gavin smith. he said everyone was so afraid of gavin early in the tourney that he took down 9 str8 pots with pre-flop raises.

gavin would be very lucky to have the best starting hand out of 10 players more than 2 or 3 times in those hands. but the lucky suckers that had better hands folded..... i wonder why?? they had the best chance to win?
Reply With Quote