[vhawk01]

[ QUOTE ]
David,

Which is more likely to have existed:

1) A very long chain of very small naturalistic changes, or
2) An infinitely complex intelligence that violates the (apparent) laws of physics.

[/ QUOTE ]

The part that I don't get is, is David saying that evolution cannot be a PROHIBITIVE favorite, unless we entirely reject the possibility of a designer God, or just that it cannot be a favorite at all? I think evolution would still certainly be the favorite, even if I believed in the possibility of a designer God, just based on past performance. But I don't know that I could call evolution a runaway favorite. Is that his point?