Re: No, I am saying the argument fails because it confuses people
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
That's a poor argument. The same could be said for playing someone heads up. They could play terribly and open fold everytime instead of trying to beat you.
[/ QUOTE ]
You are missing the point, that is why it is the perfect argument to refute the initial concept of this thread. As far as persuading a jury I am not even an attorney and am confident I could sway them to not accept the Sklansky family argument.
[/ QUOTE ]
Isn't this a matter of law though? Deciding whether poker is in fact caught under a statute as a game of chance seems to be entirely a matter of law for a judge, not a jury.
|