[David Sklansky]

I stand by my statement. Its a syllogism. If there is a designer who can, and has, designed really complex, ingeniously useful stuff. And if you come upon a complex and useful trait in an organism that doesn't seem to be explained by the known processes of evolution. Then the fact that we often eventually find an evolutionary explanation for other things does not mean that evolution is a big favorite over a designer in this particular case.

Therefore: Anyone who believes evolution is a big favorite over a designer in cases like these, must also believe that such a designer is unlikely to even exist.

My point may be a little tricky and is not directed at the atheist evolutionists who have thus far replied. It is directed at the religious evolutionists.