[MidGe]

[ QUOTE ]
But what about traits that are particularly well adapted, and there is yet no obvious path to that trait through mere mutation and survival of the fittest? I'm no expert, but I'm sure many, if not most, of the traits of living things fit that description. Evolutionists have little doubt that the fact that they can't pinpoint how those traits evolved is not strong evidence against their general theory. They are sure evolution somehow caused those traits rather than an intelligent designer. What they won't admit publicly though, maybe even to themselves, is that their certainty does not make sense unless they are also certain that there is no such thing as an intelligent designer. That last statement is a mathematical fact.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry David, imo, you need to do an Evolution 101 course. There are such traits but... whereas they have been many, over the years only explanations in evolutionary terms have been found. Never a denial of evolution. How many time do you need to see a theory working and being proven again and again in different contexts and different disciplines, and never a denial being found (falsification) for you to think it is sufficient proof?

PS Evolution has nothing to do with proving or disproving god. It simply shows that no god is necessary to explain the phenomena.