Re: Poker is a game of accidents
[ QUOTE ]
I think in the current state of online poker, you are able to get an opponent to be further off guessing your range/frequencies starting from a tight image. Prahlad (back in his online poker prime) was the example of the opposite approach.
[/ QUOTE ]
i actually believe the opposite - that successfully controlling a Prahlad-like style is going to be the most profitable approach. some reasons being it's more prone to tilt people, opponents are unfamiliar with how to outthink a hyper aggro gameplan, you can pick up stacks in unorthodox spots that you wouldn't normally, and so on. curious as to why you believe this won't produce more profit (albeit more difficult to play it perfectly) than a seamlessly shifting TAG style.
|