Thread: why boobs?
View Single Post
  #120  
Old 07-28-2004, 07:05 PM
12AX7 12AX7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 663
Default Re: why boobs? - more small breasted babes

[ QUOTE ]
hmmmm....

While these women may not NTMs, I'm not sure many of them can be considered small/flat chested, at least in the sense that Dellathia (poster formerly known as FlatChested) likely means by small/flat chested.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I suppose that's true,but none of them are in the Pam Anderson, Dolly Parton, "Elvira" class of "Caricature" breasts.

On the whole I'd say tey run from small and shapely to average and shapely.

Folks brought up Katie Holmes as an exception. To be honest, never saw her in a role where she wasn't covered up and *looked* small/average... so point being a gal can be quite attractive and not having her breasts jumping out a you.

Best example I can think of is "Twiggy" who was credited with starting the whole super-thin trend.

Anyway, was just watching "Charmed" ... Hollie Marie Combs is not Large busted...but can you really say she's not feminine and mucho sexy?

Bottom line is that there's no real "standard" except that we expect women to have women parts!

Now as for relationships, well I think it's safe to say "attraction" is the start of many relationships, and large breasts *do* catch the eyes. But, ever see the movie, "Love Potion #9"?

SandyBullock definity had smaller breasts than the blonde character... but I think most guys would find Sandy more attractive.

Another interesting thing about that movie is how they managed to take Sandy's character from mousy to stunning.

So if a gal wants an oject lesson in how that's done, carefully compare the changes in hair, makeup and dress from the biggining of the movie to the end.

Heck one of the sexiest looks she had in that movie was the scene in the park where she had the short skirt...but the busines jacket on. She looked quite flatchested there... but the legs got you going.

Granted, the hottest look was the classic black dress.

But it was the whole look. Long smooth hair, the makeup and shoes, etc. Not just "tits in you face".

As an aside, sex aside, women shouldn't have to pay for thier love with a peice of thier @ss. Pick a women you wopuld love even if there were no genitalia nor orgasms... doesn't mean she can't be pretty... I suspect everyone would be happier in the long run that way. But then that's just my philosophy. YMMV.
Reply With Quote