Re: blitzing on third and long and the problem with poker forum advice
[ QUOTE ]
Here you are also categorically wrong. The very definition of an optimal mixed strategy in game theory requires that the mixed strategy yield equal EV across all actions vs. a maximally exploitive opponent.
[/ QUOTE ]
this sir... is wrong. Even John Nash could only prove it to be the case with assigned probabilities, would you care to outdo one of the greatest geniuses of the 20th century?
Furthermore, even if an unique nash equilibrium solution is possible here, you are assuming your opponent is also playing a perfect mixed strategy game in opposition to yours.
THis is not possible in a real world poker game, which in all probability has infinite number of nash equilibriums possible, noen of which (probably) is stable.
|