Re: blitzing on third and long and the problem with poker forum advice
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
There are some situations where you can prove this is the case (see my example about dry-sidepot bluffing).
[/ QUOTE ]
I disagree, I don't think you have proved this. For a start you failed to consider the case where sometimes you value bet light into the dry sidepot on the river. I would like to see a better example (doesn't have to be a poker example, a contrived game might be even better). I'm not 100% sure if this is possible, a year ago I could have worked it out.
[/ QUOTE ]
WTF GUYS THIS IS NOT A POINT UP FOR DEBATE THIS IS A MOTHERF'ING DEFINITION WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE. MAYBE I SHOULD START A THREAD ARGUING THAT 6 IS A PRIME NUMBER. HUH? PROVOKE SOME GOOD DISCUSSION THERE, YES?
|