View Single Post
  #41  
Old 02-07-2007, 06:14 PM
B-Man B-Man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,114
Default Re: Live 25-50, big decision with bottom 2

[ QUOTE ]

I disagree for a lot of reasons, but I think it comes down to this:

I agree 84o is a terrible hand, but many of the biggest pots I have ever won have been with terrible starting hands that flopped well-disguised hands (like 2-pair).



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I'm not sure if you're talking about this hand, but your 2 pair hand was not at all well disguised. Whenever a blind checkraises I assume that a random 2 pair (SB or BB special) is in their range. You pretty much defined your hand by checkraising here, but the guy you stacked happens to be a donkey who can't read hands/lay down aces. How could he push all-in after a bet, a call, and a CR out of the blinds? Clearly the guy sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

I meant in general. In this case I agree with you. Btw, a lot of times I will lead out with 2-pair, in this case I did not. And yes, this guy is a donkey for playing it like he did. If it weren't for the other info he gave me, I would have folded.


[ QUOTE ]
At least you practice good game selection.

[/ QUOTE ]

I try. I'm don't play for ego, or the thrill of beating a great player. I play to win money. I would much rather play against a bunch of donks than good players.


[ QUOTE ]
This is not at all true assuming competent players. If you are playing against clueless calling stations who will not fold any pair, then your analysis makes more sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, but as I said, against a solid player I would have folded pretty quickly. There are a lot of donks out there...
Reply With Quote