[guenttrs]

[ QUOTE ]
Against blinds is a good hand , push here .
No matter what happened in 10 sits played . You can play another 10 sits and have a very different results .
Play a lot more and see the results every 50 sits ( play with a bigger bankroll) . If it is negative on 3 o 4 sample size or there is a common mistake , try to fix it .
A question : What was yours results on 6.50 ?

[/ QUOTE ]

I never played the 6.5 because i had the bankroll to play the $16 and the fee is smaller compared to the buyin. I came from PartyPoker where i played a lot of cashgames and make a bankroll over 2k. With some cash left at party from a friend invitation i start playing sngs there and made $300 playing the $10 (dont know exactly what the buyin was). At PokerStars i play the 2/4$ cashgames and added the sngs to play i wider range of poker variants. I started with a ROI over 20% over the first 200 sngs at $16, while the next 150 running bad. Now at 350 i'm down to 6% ROI. Not a big problem if this ROI was constant over the time. OK ok i know what you will say "Samplesize by far to low" Yes you're right, but its not so funny for my psyche. When i start playing sngs i had an natural approach. Playing tight, doubling up, survive the bubble and try to trap them or win by pure pressure HU. When i start to learn more about sngs here, i start to play different. Steal a lot more and play even tighter in the early levels. Now i run really bad at the bubble. I think this is normal with many things in live. When you want to change and improve something you often make more mistakes at the beginning. I try to learn ... please continue to help me.