View Single Post
  #53  
Old 02-05-2007, 09:48 PM
Tuff_Fish Tuff_Fish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 980
Default Re: Interesting Washington Post Article About NETELLER

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know if this has been mentioned (I would assume it has). If everyone at a one branch bank went to get their money on the same day the bank would not have that money. If they didn't have the ability to borrow they would have to liquidate all of those assets ASAP which would cost them a fortune. They can continue to lie but it is obvious what has happened and they really have no incentive to give us our money in a timely manner.

I still am baffled at why the sites we frequent are still doing business with them. IMO the sites feel as vulnerable thus causing a certain amount of empathy on their part.

No site we play at should be doing business with Neteller until we get all of our money back. Plain and Simple.

Our money is not frozen, its not in trust, it is being held against our will.

Every site we play at should demand that we get our money back or they will not do business with them. If one site did this I would play there and so should all of you.

[/ QUOTE ]

I will do it on pokerstars if everyone else will do it too.

Somebody on here with some leadership credibility (well that narrows it down) choose a 24 hour period and just say no... to playing on pokerstars.

I can only help out with pokerstars since that is the only site I have money on. (Thanks Green Devil)

Tuff
Reply With Quote