[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.associatedcontent.com/art..._neteller.html
In the USA Today, FBI agent Neil Donovan told the USA Today that "funds from Neteller are being held in court as potential evidence. Some customers may get their money back."
[/ QUOTE ]
Oh could we pleeeeeeease stop refering to that lame article. As has been mentioned numerous times before, how would this have occured and NO news of it have leaked out? The USA Today article appears to be a mish-mash of info from the BetOnSports and Neteller cases. If funds had been seized, this would be HUGE news. The article you have quoted takes the USA Today piece and combines it with an Online Wire piece, where the same FBI agent says "What's in there [USA Today article] is in there, but I really cannot comment further.", and they cite "wire reports" claiming the FBI has seized funds. What wire reports? Why has no one else picked up these wire reports?
The same inaccurate information is being quoted and requoted in different articles, and the story gets farther and farther from any kind of properly confirmed truth.
If you are going to refer to a news article, there was a much better one in the Washington Post refered to in this thread:
Washington Post
[/ QUOTE ]
Wouldn't a retraction be demanded if the article was wrong in a fundemental point, ie DOJ seized money? Wouldn't one of the parties concerned demand it?