Re: 5/10 UB 98s vs TAG
Okay, what the hell, let's try to approximate a range for Villain (because I think check-folding the river would be bad [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]).
So I don't know, maybe something like this:
AQ = er, 10? (I want one club in there most of the time, but not two, so I'm discounting/approximating).
ATs = like 1 or less
66 and worse = 6, maybe(?), based on the idea that Villain will 3-bet light but then perhaps give up after getting called on this flop?
Some 3-bet with junk for the sake of a fellow 2+2er = 2(?)
Meanwhile . . .
QQ/TT/99 = 15
AJ = 8
QJ/JT/rando-type light 3-bets = 3(?)
Some "tricky" slowplay just for the sake of a fellow 2+2er = er, 3 (?)
I don't claim any sort of precision to this range, but check-folding seems bad, doesn't it?
The main problem with betting that I see is that we open ourselves up to being outplayed a little more than with a check, because we could face a raise that's only sort of credible and then have the choice of either paying it off because the raise isn't entirely believable (does Villain really have AJ?) or folding to it and possibly getting owned.
|