[jaydub]

[ QUOTE ]
Jared,

Thanks much for the post/summary. Frankly, it's a little depressing and disappointing that there's so much mod posturing and jockeying over stuff that at the end of the day does pretty much nothing of substance to improve the site, yet there's not serious discussion/support/planning to get initiatives going that would make this a fundamentally better experience for users, plus a significantly more valuable web property.


[/ QUOTE ]

Clearly you are continuing to jab a stick at the hornet nest here.

[ QUOTE ]

Sure, mods don't get paid, but a smart mod could figure out ways to implement some of these proposals with contracting fees + possible revenue shares.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, the 2+2 mods are clearly business focused individuals who have the ability to put together such a proposal.

I suspect your point is that 2+2 has a poor selection strategy for mods but I think you overlook the distinction between mod and admin. Admins propose such things, mods delete [censored] smearing posts (well generally).

[ QUOTE ]

On the bright side, at least there has been extensive discussion and consensus reached on the pressing issue of whether jiggling boobie avatars should be allowed in the Lounge.

In any case, I'll continue to offer suggestions that either 2+2 or other poker websites can feel free to take advantage of.

[/ QUOTE ]

Out of curiosity, don't you think these are all a couple years too late? I don't have access to the financials but I suspect 2+2 / conjelco left a lot of money on the table. Seems to me that a poker website is not something I'd want to invest heavily in right now.

J