Re: It\'s about time we had this discussion
I'm not sure I like the theory of this. I think I disagree with you saying that you'd be pretty unreadable...
Varying bet sizes would stand out in the current environment so people would notice you more and start to read into what you mean by a certain raise much much more quickly than if it were constant. Then you've got to start varying your varying bets to throw off the reads and then you spent a lot of effort screwing around at the point of the hand where you only have 2 cards instead 5/6/7. There's enough intricacy in post-flop play to not worry about this especially if, as you say, you're playing 12 tables. The current situation is such that, once you know your players and hand, you can decide in an instant whether to raise/call/fold. If you went to this you'd need post-flop style analysis pre-flop on 12 tables simultaneously.
There may be a decent set up described but the requirement to not be read, imo, makes it neccessarily worse in overall effect than constant raises.
|