[MicroBob]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

*** You are ignoring this user ***

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you hyperventilating again now that (once again) I have shown you how little you understand?

Once a fool......

[/ QUOTE ]


William - I have no axe to grind in any direction on this - but it is really necessary to be offensive to everyone who has the temerity to disagree with you? It hardly adds weight to your assertions and beliefs. It reminds me of the pointless hostility I see in the table chat and has just as little purpose here.

[/ QUOTE ]


He's not just insulting me because I disagreed with him here.
He's insulted me on a few other occasions before and seems to have some issue with me personally.
Mentioning that I have no balls and stuff like that.


I didn't ignore him then because I thought it was still worth reading some of his insights. Whether or not I agreed with him I thought his perspective was worth listening to even if I didn't want to directly discuss things with him anymore.

But I've decided that even that isn't really worth it. His rudeness is just irritating so I'd rather do without it.


I do find it odd that he is accusing me of hyper-ventilating (I got to read what he said when you quoted him) when he is clearly pretty excited about 'how unforgiveable' Stox's actions are in all this.


He thinks his view is right. That's fine.
I agree that neteller is going to pay and that taking Stox's insurance is a sucker-play.
Just disagree that Stox actually offering it is such an unforgiveable offense. No biggie.

I agree that his tone does not lend credit to his argument.