Re: U Make the Decision – One Player Knows and One Doesn’t
*grunch*
Wait for the action to get back to Seat 3. This could be at the end of the round or because there's a raise by Seat 7.
Now, under SOSA, everyone's entitled to the same information as Seat 3, so Seat 2 tables his all-in hand.
I suppose a very strict SOSA interpretation would be to show the hand immediately, but common sense says that Seat 5 acted on the $300 without that knowledge. Since 3 is the offender -- possibly an unwitting offender -- I have no problem with letting 7 act on more information than 3. But 5 should have been entitled to this information too, so my only concern would be benefitting 7 vis a vis 5.
|